top of page

5 Costly Mistakes Condo Boards Make During Recertification Projects

  • Writer: Oscar Ciriano
    Oscar Ciriano
  • May 11
  • 5 min read
South Florida condominium recertification and restoration project overlooking Biscayne Bay

Building recertification projects in South Florida have become one of the biggest challenges for condominium associations and property managers. Between structural inspections, contractor coordination, resident concerns, rising construction costs, and strict city deadlines, many boards find themselves navigating highly complex projects with limited construction experience.

Unfortunately, small decisions made at the beginning of the process can quickly turn into expensive problems later. Delays, change orders, budget overruns, contractor disputes, and poor coordination are some of the most common issues seen during recertification projects.

Below are five of the most costly mistakes condo boards make during recertification projects — and how they can be avoided.


1. Selecting a Contractor Based Only on Price

One of the most common mistakes boards make is selecting the lowest proposal without fully understanding the scope of work, exclusions, contractor experience, or project logistics.

A lower price may initially appear attractive, especially when associations are under pressure to control costs. However, incomplete scopes, missing line items, unrealistic schedules, or lack of coordination often lead to major change orders and disputes later in the project.

Many proposals contain exclusions hidden in the fine print:

  • Waterproofing details

  • Structural repairs discovered during demolition

  • Permit revisions

  • Temporary protections

  • Drainage modifications

  • Excessive costs associated with Additional General Conditions


These exclusions can significantly increase the final project cost.

Instead of focusing only on the lowest number, boards should evaluate:

  • Contractor experience with occupied condominium buildings

  • Financial stability

  • Schedule realism

  • Quality of previous projects

  • Coordination capabilities

  • Scope completeness

  • Warranty coverage

The goal should not simply be finding the cheapest contractor — it should be selecting the contractor that can successfully complete the project with the least risk to the association.


2. One of the Most Common Condo Recertification Mistakes: Poor Project Coordination

Many boards assume that once the contract is signed and permits are issued, the project will naturally move forward on its own.

In reality, recertification projects require constant coordination between multiple parties:

  • Engineers

  • Contractors

  • Inspectors

  • Architects

  • Property management

  • Residents

  • City officials

  • Vendors and suppliers

Without strong communication and oversight, even well-designed projects can begin to lose momentum.

Some of the most common causes of delays include:

  • Pending RFIs

  • Incomplete drawings

  • Inspection scheduling conflicts

  • Material procurement delays

  • Resident access issues

  • Contractor sequencing problems

  • Incomplete submittals

  • Poor communication between trades

On large condominium projects, coordination becomes just as important as construction itself.

We often explain to boards that restoration projects are not simply construction jobs — they are coordination projects with construction attached to them.

A successful project depends on keeping all parties aligned, organized, and accountable throughout the entire process.


3. Approving Payment Applications Without Proper Review

Payment applications are one of the most important financial control tools available to an association during construction.

Unfortunately, many condominium associations and property managers approve contractor invoices without requiring the official AIA payment application documents or fully understanding what is actually being billed. In many cases, payments are processed based solely on invoices, without proper backup documentation, schedule of values verification, percentage-complete analysis, or confirmation that the work has actually been completed in the field.

A proper payment application review should verify:

  • Percentage of completed work

  • Actual installed quantities

  • Stored materials

  • Change order status

  • Retainage

  • Backup documentation

  • Lien releases

  • Schedule progress

Overpaying contractors early in the project can create major financial exposure later.

If the project experiences delays, disputes, defective work, or contractor performance issues, recovering those funds becomes significantly more difficult.

Associations should ensure that payments are tied to verified progress in the field — not simply to invoices submitted on paper.

This is especially important in large restoration projects where monthly payment applications can reach substantial amounts.

Proper financial oversight during construction is not about slowing the project down. It is about protecting the association’s investment and maintaining leverage throughout the process.


4. Waiting Too Long to Address Waterproofing and Structural Deterioration

One of the most expensive mistakes a condominium association can make is delaying repairs after the first warning signs of deterioration begin to appear.

In South Florida, small building issues rarely remain small for long.

Water intrusion, failed sealants, balcony leaks, cracks, rust staining, and ponding water are often early indicators of more significant deterioration occurring behind the surface. Because of the region’s constant humidity, salt exposure, heavy rain, and UV conditions, building deterioration tends to accelerate much faster than many residents and board members realize.

What may initially appear to be:

  • minor cracking,

  • isolated leaks,

  • or cosmetic deterioration,

can eventually develop into:

  • concrete spalling,

  • structural steel corrosion,

  • interior water damage,

  • expanded restoration scopes,

  • and costly emergency repairs.

In many cases, associations end up spending substantially more money because repairs were postponed instead of addressed proactively during the early stages of deterioration.

Additionally, under current Florida recertification and milestone inspection requirements, condominium associations are legally required to complete the necessary repairs identified during the inspection process. Failure to move forward with corrective work can expose the building to municipal violations, penalties, unsafe structure conditions, and significant daily fines imposed by the city.

Delays can also create additional complications such as:

  • permit extensions,

  • insurance concerns,

  • resident complaints,

  • contractor remobilization costs,

  • and extended project timelines.

Early intervention almost always helps reduce:

  • repair costs,

  • project complexity,

  • resident disruption,

  • long-term liability exposure,

  • and the risk of regulatory fines or enforcement actions.

The earlier a building addresses deterioration, the more control the association typically maintains over both the budget and the overall project outcome.


5. Not Having Independent Oversight Focused on the Association’s Best Interest

This is one of the most overlooked issues in condominium restoration projects.

Many boards assume the contractor will naturally manage the project in the association’s best interest. However, contractors are primarily responsible for construction execution — not necessarily for protecting the association from financial risk, coordination gaps, or scope conflicts.

Large restoration projects require independent oversight focused specifically on the owner’s side of the project.

That oversight includes:

  • Contractor coordination

  • Cost monitoring

  • Schedule tracking

  • Payment application review

  • Change order analysis

  • Documentation management

  • Quality monitoring

  • Communication between all parties

An experienced Owner’s Representative acts as an additional layer of protection for the board and property management team.

The role is not to interfere with the contractor or engineer. The role is to help the association maintain visibility, accountability, and control throughout a highly complex process.

Independent oversight often helps reduce:

  • unnecessary change orders,

  • delays,

  • communication breakdowns,

  • contractor disputes,

  • and scope gaps.

Most importantly, it helps boards make more informed decisions throughout construction.

Final Thoughts

Recertification projects are not simply maintenance projects anymore. They are large-scale operational, financial, and logistical undertakings that directly impact the future of a condominium association.

The decisions made during the early

stages of the project can significantly affect:

  • project costs,

  • construction timelines,

  • resident experience,

  • and long-term building performance.

The good news is that many of the most expensive problems can be avoided through proper planning, coordination, communication, and oversight.

At BRS Florida, we work alongside condominium associations and property managers to help navigate restoration and recertification projects through independent owner representation, construction coordination, cost monitoring, and project oversight.

Successful projects are rarely the result of luck.

They are usually the result of strong coordination, clear communication, and informed decision-making from the very beginning.



Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
brs-logo-header-250x100

Company Info

BRS Building Restoration Services, LLC
"An Owner’s Rep Company"


📍 501 East Las Olas Boulevard
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301


📧 Email: info@brsflorida.com


📞 Phone: 954-281-9679

Follow Us:
 

  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • X

Legal:

  • © 2025 BRS Florida. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions

  • Privacy Policy

bottom of page